MEP Engineering Blog

3 energy saving strategies to reduce impact of high occupancy spaces

Posted by Bob Roop

Find me on:

Nov 9, 2015, 12:30:00 PM

demand control ventilation air handling equipment energy efficient design mep engineer

Demand Control Ventilation and energy recovery methods can boost building efficiency

Some of the most challenging areas confronting the designers of HVAC systems for K-12 schools are the high occupant load areas such as Cafeterias, Gymnasiums and Auditoriums. Code dictates a very high occupant load which must then be accounted for in the heating/cooling calculations, but that occupant load also translates into a code-prescribed outside air ventilation rate.

In many cases, the outside air ventilation rate is greater than the calculated airflow for heating and/or cooling. Often, these spaces have a varied occupant load mixing periods of nearly full occupancy with other times of minimal to no occupancy. To minimize the effects of the large quantities of outside air required on the overall energy consumption of the building, we have employed energy recovery and Demand Control Ventilation strategies with great success.

Energy Recovery

One of the simplest methods to reduce the outside air impact is to employ an energy recovery device inside custom or semi-custom air handling equipment. There are many types of energy recovery devices used by MEP engineers today, but the two most widely applied forms utilize flat plate and wheel heat exchanger technologies.

Energy saving strategy #1: Flat plate heat exchangers 

Flat plate heat exchangers are constructed from thin aluminum sheets, folded in an accordion-like fashion and placed into solid end panels on two sides.

      What flat plate heat exchangers do:

  • Create pathways for two separate air streams, one for the outside air being introduced into the building and the other for the relief/exhaust air being removed from the building. 
  • Transfer (recover) heat from one air stream into the other across the thin aluminum sheets. 
  • Capable of transferring (recovering) approximately 70% of the Sensible heat from the warmer air stream to the cooler airstream.

Energy saving strategy #2: Energy recovery wheels

Energy recovery wheels are constructed of multiple types of material ranging from thin metal film to desiccant impregnated polymer materials. 

      What energy recovery wheels do:

  • Create two separate air streams with each air stream hitting a different portion of a rotating wheel.
  • Absorb heat via the portion exposed to the warmer air stream, and transfer that heat to the cooler air stream as the wheel rotates.
  • Transfer (recover) both Sensible and Latent heat; efficiencies vary based on material type, but are generally in the 60-70% range.

Demand Control Ventilation

A slightly more complex method of reducing the impact of the outside air load is a strategy called Demand Control Ventilation (DCV). This approach can be accomplished with standard air handling equipment, as opposed to the custom or semi-custom energy recovery air handling equipment, which generally makes the entry cost somewhat less than energy recovery. However, unlike energy recovery, there is no possibility to regain any waste heat from the relief/exhaust air streams; this cost savings often negates the lower first cost of the DCV systems.

Energy saving strategy #3: DCV Systems

In a DCV system, the heating and cooling capacity of the equipment is sized to provide the code required minimum outside air ventilation rate, but the equipment is not controlled to provide that volume at all times. 

      What DCV systems do:

  • Provide a “Base Ventilation Rate” (BVR) volume of outside air under no or low occupant loads. This BVR is generally much lower than the code-required minimum outside air quantity. 
  • Using space Carbon Dioxide (CO2) levels as a predictor of occupant loads (demand), the outside air damper is controlled to only modulate open beyond the BVR position only when space CO2 rises above a programmable offset from the CO2 concentration of the air outside the building. 

In essence, this strategy works to maintain an environment where the air within the space remains diluted to a programmable CO2 concentration. As CO2 levels rise, it is accepted that occupancy has risen, and therefore a greater quantity of outside air is necessary to meet the ventilation rates associated with those occupants. The outside air damper will continue to modulate open only to the code required minimum position, and will remain there until space CO2 levels begin to decline.

How Peter Basso Associates can help

Peter Basso Associates has proven all three of these techniques to be effective in reducing the impact of the large outside air quantities required to satisfy the code requirements of high occupant loads. Each has several benefits, and also some associated complexities. If you would like more information on how any of these systems could be a benefit to you and your facilities, please contact us.

Contact us to learn more about how Peter Basso Associates can use its decades of  commissioning, engineering and LEED® expertise to help improve your building's operations and performance. 

Request Consultation

 

Topics: K-12, Energy, HVAC, MEP

   

Subscribe to our Blog

Recent Posts

Posts by Topic

see all

Follow Me